A Level Psychology OCR Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the A Level Psychology OCR Exam with confidence. Engage with in-depth flashcards and multiple-choice questions that provide hints and thorough explanations. Equip yourself to excel on your exam!

Start Multiple Choice Practice Test
Start Flash Cards

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What was Milgram's conclusion regarding authority's command over individuals?

  1. Authority figures should be questioned frequently

  2. People have an inherent right to refuse commands

  3. The potential for harm under authority is concerning

  4. Only the government has the right to command

The correct answer is: The potential for harm under authority is concerning

Milgram's research highlighted the extent to which individuals are willing to obey authority figures, even when such obedience could lead to harmful outcomes for others. The conclusion that the potential for harm under authority is concerning stems from the shocking behavior observed during his experiments, where participants inflicted pain on others purely based on an authority figure's instructions. This finding raised critical ethical questions about the power dynamics between authority and individual moral responsibility. Moreover, it underscored the risks that come with blind obedience to authority, especially in situations where commands may lead to ethical violations or cause suffering. The implications of Milgram's study continue to resonate in discussions about authority, obedience, and the moral responsibilities that individuals have when faced with such commands.

More Questions Like This