A Level Psychology OCR Practice Exam

How did the research of Levine et al differ in terms of cultural diversity compared to Piliavin et al?

1. Levine included a wider range of urban settings

2. Piliavin had a more diverse sample

3. Levine did not consider urban environments

4. Piliavin exclusively studied in global cities

The correct answer is: Levine included a wider range of urban settings

Levine et al.'s research is known for its extensive examination of helping behavior across various cultures, specifically focusing on a diverse array of urban settings around the world. This broader range allowed them to study the effects of cultural factors on altruism in different contexts, providing a more comprehensive understanding of how cultural diversity influences helping behavior. In contrast, Piliavin et al.'s research primarily took place within a specific urban environment, notably the New York City subway. While they gathered valuable insights into helping behavior in that particular setting, it lacked the same level of cultural diversity that Levine et al. explored through their worldwide approach. Thus, the inclusion of a wider range of urban settings in Levine's study highlights its unique contribution to understanding cultural factors in social behavior, distinguishing it from Piliavin et al.'s work.